Monday, October 29, 2018

Man's Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl

4 1/2 Stars


Reality is tough...


           Sometimes it seems that there are far too many pretty stories to mask the ugliness of the world—stories where everything turns out in the end.  In school, growing up, our teachers would turn of the overhead projector and teach us about the harsh realities of the world. “During World War II, Hitler arrested the Jewish people and put them into concentration camps. Many of them died. The end.” So rarely are we given the full story through the lens of a documentary, textbook, or instructor. So rarely are we able to fully understand the tragic events that occurred during the Holocaust. Man’s Search for Meaning by Viktor Frankl is the kind of story that only comes around once in a lifetime. It is a story of bravery, perseverance, and the spirit of the human condition.
            My grandpa fought overseas in World War II and never have I heard a single one of his stories or experiences. In fact, even his kids and his wife, have very little information. Last year, he passed away and sometimes I wonder what made the stoic, strong man, who never gave up his military buzz cut, who he was. What events shaped the way he approached his life, career, and family? I suppose I’ll never know, but this is why these first-person accounts of horror and tragedy are greatly important to our understanding as a culture and as human beings. So many accounts have been lost because of the victims’ refusal to speak of the terror they endured. My dad gave Man’s Search for Meaning to me as a Christmas present about six years ago because it was a pivotal book for his growth and understanding of what it meant to be human…and what it meant to be alive. I regret not reading this book when I was younger because I can guarantee that it could have helped me see myself as normal. It could have helped me navigate all the indecision and hopelessness that I felt in my purpose. It is a book that all people should read; because no matter where someone is in their life, it’s important to find that meaning.
            Viktor Frankl’s approach to his lot in life was inspiring. As he goes through the years at the Nazi concentration camps, he doesn’t complain once about his whole ordeal but approaches it in a way that helped him better understand why he was put on the earth and how he could make a difference with his observations and psychological roots. I have never read a book that doesn’t dance around such a traumatic experience. Frankl’s words are blunt, real, and he tells his story as if he were telling it to a close friend or family member. There’s one part in particular that really stood out to me when he was talking about meaning. Frankl was working in a trench with other prisoners and with the dawn came a grey sky. Frankl was speaking to his wife in his head because it was what kept him sane and he was trying to understand the reason for all of his suffering. In that moment he seemed to remember his soul “transcending” the world of gloom and watching as a light in a distant farmhouse turned on and he finally felt as if the whole reason for his suffering was right before him. He finally felt his wife was with him as he spoke to her. And as he did, a bird flew overhead and perched on the dirt mound he had just discarded and looked at him.
            The part about this whole thought process that really moves me is that at this point Frankl knows that his wife is dead, that he’ll never see her again, but he sees hope in the light and the bird in which he knows that she will always be with him. The whole point of this story is about finding hope in a hopeless situation. Frankl doesn’t explain the events leading up to his arrest because we all know that story, he doesn’t divulge the events leading to the Allies’ rescue of the people in the camps because we know that as well. Rather, Frankl’s power lies in his artful metaphors and his telling of the events in the camp as they happened rather than glossing over the fact that the people who endured these atrocities also suffered psychologically. We see pictures of the malnourished men and women in the camps with their shaved heads and ribs exposed, but we could never comprehend the mental trauma these people endured as well. At least with Frankl’s book, we are able to understand further and empathize more with the plight of the Jewish people during the Holocaust. 
            I’m sad this book is not a requirement for high school curriculums. All I ever knew about the Holocaust was from documentaries and textbooks. My clarity of the situation was diminished through remote accounts of the reality—as if looking through a smokescreen. My appreciation for this book has expanded tenfold since I was first given it as a gift. Frankl’s words have greatly influenced my understanding of my meaning on this earth and my purpose. Life isn’t pretty, but there are some extraordinary moments. Man’s Search for Meaning illustrates this stark reality.

With love,
Lauren

*Check out my other reviews -->here<--
*Subscribe to receive notification when I post!


Saturday, August 18, 2018

Midnight at the Electric by Jodi Lynn Anderson


5 Stars

I AM A PHILOSOPHICAL MESS RN

Rating:  PG
Language:  G
Violence:  PG (There's a scene where an animal is cut open--my least favorite kinds of scene EVER)
Sex:  PG  (Inferences are made that it did happen, but nothing is described)
Drugs/Alcohol:  G           

           Every once in awhile you come across a book that is so monumental that even as you’re reading it, you know it has become a favorite for the rest of your life. Jodi Lynn Anderson has an uncanny ability to make me feel and hope for characters in just 250 pages. I’ve lost a lot of my faith in the YA genre recently because of all the books published, it’s very rare to find one where the characters are able to grow and change through difficult decisions.

            This book is about nothing and about everything all at once. It’s about family, finding new love, losing an old love, grief, and the bravery it takes to do what’s best for those who you care about most. It’s something most of us don’t think about too deeply because it’s the natural revolution of life. This story has a poignant way of assisting our understanding of the human condition—it’s sad at times, difficult and rough, but it is also filled with empathy, love, and complete and utter bravery. It takes a lot of strength to leave behind everything you know in hopes for a better life and I respect those decisions now more than ever.

            Through the book, we follow three characters—Adri, Lenore, and Catherine—all of whom are connected through a little farm in Canaan, Kansas. Adri stumbles upon the letters and entries from Catherine and Lenore as she’s waiting to be shipped off to Mars on a permanent mission. Through the girls, 100 years older than herself, Adri was finally able to find a human connection in a world where she thought she was completely alone.

            The importance of knowing your history and connecting with those of past generations is a pivotal point in the story. Recently, I was in Minnesota with my dad and we passed the house where my great-grandparents used to live and where my grandpa was born. It made me think of how much these little towns have seen. Passing the house, we saw it was recently sold; a fresh coat of paint applied; but inside was where there was so much life. That house had seen people live. Babies were born there, children were raised, grandchildren appeared, and people passed away. There were probably screaming fights and moments of quiet grief and that house saw it all as it transferred to each new family.

            I’m using a house as an example, but for this story, Anderson used a Galapagos tortoise. This tortoise was there when new life was conceived, she was there for births and deaths, she saw the hardest of life as children struggled to stay alive amidst the dust storms of the 30s. She saw the birth of new love, she saw children grow into adults, and watched as a family’s time came to an end just so another family could fit into the picture. She was the real trove of history. As Adri was reading the letters and the journal, the girls felt far away in the past. They were long dead and had faded into history, but as she watched Galapagos the turtle, sitting in the backyard, she realized that this turtle saw everything. This turtle was history…and I think that’s a very powerful thing. People can fade, but there might be someone (or something) left that still remembers and knows.

            I find it really hard to write the correct words down that express my overall gratitude and love for this story. People forget to reflect on the quiet moments in life and they’re often left forgotten. This is why this book makes me so inanely happy (but so sad at the same time). It has helped remind me to enjoy the little moments and rejoice in them because “a whole life can begin with one little spark.”  

(I will be making my whole family read this book. No question).

“There was a time Mama would say she dreamt of going back to England…and I used to believe her. But now I suspect—despite the terrible uncertainties beyond Canaan—that the main thing is she believes happiness is something behind her, to remember instead of chase.”

Onward and forward,
Lauren

*Check out my other reviews -->here<--
*Subscribe to receive notifications when I post more!

Sunday, July 15, 2018

This Dark Endeavor by Kenneth Oppel


4 Stars

I would take three stars away for the animal death, but I’m not that petty.

Book Rating:  PG
Violence: PG (Like I said, ANIMAL DEATH)
Language: PG (A** was the only noticeable one, but maybe I just wasn’t paying attention)
Sex:  PG (“I felt tears on her cheeks, and tasted their salt against my tongue” is about as raunchy as it gets. Pretty innocent overall).
Drugs/Alcohol: G (Alcohol is used on one of the characters as a numbing agent).

            What an interesting take on the early life of Victor Frankenstein! I greatly enjoyed this read. It was dark at times, filled with adventure spurred by bonds of friendship, and was driven by well-rounded, engaging characters.

            I really enjoyed the back story which served as the kindling for Victor Frankenstein’s alchemical interests. Victor seeks to save his twin brother, Konrad’s, life after he falls fatally ill with an unknown sickness. Victor immediately turns to the ancient books of alchemy to find a cure. That cure is found in the Elixir of Life.

            Despite Victor not being particularly likable—he’s jealous and self-absorbed—I managed to still enjoy him. He was likable to me, despite his flaws, which is a sign of excellent writing. Authors sometimes struggle to make their characters likable despite their flaws and sometimes they fall into the trap of creating a character without any whatsoever. Victor’s personality isn’t what you would typically see for a main character in fiction. He’s the brother caught beneath his older brother’s more charismatic, more successful shadow. It was refreshing.

            And can we talk about the magical settings of Geneva and the Frankenstein Manor??  Gorgeous. Enchanting. Loved it all. It felt like a fantasy land within a historical world and it was everything I wanted. Victor, Konrad, their distant cousin Elizabeth, and friend Henry were separated from the real world through the manor as they produced plays and went on adventures throughout the grounds. It felt like a whole other world.

            I was also smitten with Victor and Elizabeth as a pair. I’m not sure if they’re great as a couple, but their chemistry was palpable which made their relationship all the more exciting. Victor’s passion combined with Elizabeth’s was powerful and they both knew it, but because of Elizabeth’s love for Konrad, (yes, a love triangle), it was suppressed. And honestly, the love triangle wasn’t terrible. It was actually well-written.

Just the relationships and the bonds between family were really a selling point for me. It’s rare to find a YA book where the parents of the children are ever present parts of the children’s lives.

            There were very few things I didn’t like about this book. My main issue was that it was written in a very simple manner. There was just a lot of he said, she said throughout, without much diversity in speaking actions. For example:

“Of course,” she said, entering the cell and looking at the table. “Is it done?”
“It is,” I said, stoppering the flask and shaking it vigorously.
“You are very clever, Victor,” she said.
“Anyone might have done it,” I said, pleased by her praise.

Honestly, it’s nothing too bad; I just would have liked some diversity in the speech. Maybe throwing in an asked or exclaimed would have been nice every once in a while.

            I’ll be giving this book to my mom to read as soon as I take all of my sticky notes out of it. It’s a good mix of fantasy, history, and gothic romance—everything I (and my mom) love. I’d highly recommend this to anyone who has a deep love for gothic romances.

"These past weeks, during Konrad's illness, my mind--awake and dreaming--had been filled with dread and cobwebs and darkness. I wanted the sun to burn them all away."


*Check out my other reviews -->here<--
*Subscribe to receive notifications for when I post more reviews!

Sunday, June 24, 2018

The Burning Sky by Sherry Thomas


1.5 Stars

(The language used was this book's only redeeming quality)
OFFICIALLY FROM 60% IN AND A SKIM OF THE REST OF THE BOOK
Rating:  PG
Violence:  PG
Language:  PG (I think they use “bastard”)
Sex:  PG  (Titus talks about mediocre lovemaking from the prostitutes, he and Iolanthe kiss, as to be expected)
Drugs/Alcohol:  G

               I have desperately tried to like this book. I first started it in 2015, THREE YEARS AGO. Since then I have tried time and time again to pick up the book and like it, gall dangit! But the literary gods had other plans and it ended up just being a mess of a fantasy read. The problem is that this book definitely had potential; it had LOADS of potential. There was a diverse and complicated fantasy world, a prince, magic, a boarding school. This story literally had everything in place to make it great. Instead, it majorly exploded in a barrage of poor characterization, boring subplots, and underdeveloped fantasy contexts.

                I liked Iolanthe to start out. I liked how the book began with a strike of lightning caused by an elemental mage. I liked how Iolanthe hung out with her mentor, Master Haywood, in a little house settled into a little, woodsy town. I had hope. But how naïve I was. As soon as Iolanthe escaped and met Prince Titus, things went downhill. The problem with these characters is that I have read them all before. You have Iolanthe, the “chosen one,” the most powerful mage of her time who doesn’t believe in her own skillset and says time and time again that she’s nothing important so why would people want her? Then, there’s Titus, the love interest, the prince, the guy who seems to be good at everything but hides his tragic past behind a façade of sarcastic wit and a devil-may-care attitude. We then have the traditional villain and the Gandalf-like character and it just doesn’t settle well. There’s nothing about any of the characters that makes me care about them.

                I got 60% into the book and at the 60% mark I still had no idea why Atlantis needed a powerful mage or why they cared. They have an entire city of mages that go unchecked so why the heck do they desperately need Iolanthe? Sure, she can call down a bolt of lightning, but I’m unconvinced that she’s more powerful than anyone else. (I’ve come to accept that I will be eternally confused by the plot of this book, and I’m okay with that. But if someone would like to clarify Iolanthe’s superiority or would like to help me understand why Atlantis needs her so badly, please do, because I’m very confused). I felt like the world lacked in development. The only thing I can tell you for sure is that this fantastical world is set within the real world and there’s a High Inquisitor that runs basically everything and a Callista who is a bad guy (I think). There was also a whole ordeal with this book, The Crucible, that can take the mage to a specific place and time and give them tasks or obstacles they must overcome. This book came out of nowhere and I still am confused as to why Titus is adamant that Iolanthe practice inside of it. Is it to be at her strongest when she comes face to face with the Inquisitor who wants her for reasons unknown? If this world would have been better explained, if there had been more development, I guarantee that I wouldn’t have felt the way I do now.

                Several reviewers say to be patient with this story. I’d agree; it takes loads of patience. Enough patience to last you through 60% of the book and skimming the last 40% before deciding it’s not worth another minute of your time. The plot fell flat, the characters fell flat, and the world itself fell flat. This book did a lot of faceplants. Even if the world or the plot is underdeveloped, it would have been a saving grace if there was good development of relationships and of characters. I was supposed to want Iolanthe and Titus to succeed; I was supposed to want them to be together, but the whole dynamic felt forced and I just couldn’t take it anymore.

                I understand that many people have enjoyed this book. I’ve mentioned in other reviews that I have a bad habit of disliking books that others have loved and it seems the trend continues. I like my fantasy books well-rounded, others like theirs simple and to the point. This story just wasn’t for me.

“What kind of person are you to live without honor or integrity?”
His nails dug into his palm. “Obviously, the kind chosen for what others are too decent to do.”

*Check out my other reviews -->here<--
*Subscribe to get notifications when I post more reviews!

May Fortune walk with you,
Lauren

Monday, June 18, 2018

Princesses Behaving Badly by Linda Rodriguez McRobbie


Solid 3.5 Stars


MAYBE I DON'T WANT TO BE A PRINCESS

           
          This book wasn’t bad, it was actually quite interesting; but there were a lot of small things that added up into making it not worthy of over the three-ish star mark.

            The history in the book was interesting. I loved learning about the different princesses or anti-princesses that broke the common mold and paved their way to infamy through battles, sexual favors, or by direct infiltration of the monarchy. Many of the princesses I’ve heard of before and have even admired in the past, but many of them were also weird, wacky, and sometimes downright terrifying. Plus, the shortness of each story was really nice. It didn’t feel like an overload of information which was great for someone with my attention span.

            BUT. There were several small factors that just added up into a controlled mess. To start, there were minor typos. And when I say minor, I mean that they were very minimal such as writing Princess Elisabeth’s name as Elizabeth every once in awhile. They were so minor that it didn’t deter from the book that much; it was just an inconvenience.

            Secondly, for a book that is supposed to be celebrating women, the author used the word slut several times which rubbed me the wrong way. I feel like I would have been okay with it if it was a word that was used back in the early first century and the 1400s (the eras in which she used the word). I don’t know, I may be nitpicking here, but it would have been better to use words that were contemporary to the time. It would have been better if the author didn’t call these women out as “slutty” even when just using the term as an example of a common misconception. Again, this could be totally far-fetched. I was talking to my mom earlier about my dislike for its use in the book (because it’s also not very academic) but she didn’t see a problem with it, so it could just be me.

            Finally, when I was reading through the references in the back of the book, I decided that I didn’t know how many of the stories I could believe. The author used many academic sources for her research, but she also used many non-academic sources such as blog posts, The BBC, and The New York Times. Now, these publications are generally accepted as viable sources for information, but they weren’t written by experts in the field who know exactly what they’re talking about. The articles were written by journalists—and while journalists are good at writing and research, the articles could also be full of bias which makes the information in the book itself less reliable. (I guess it makes sense, though. The author is a journalist herself).

Don’t get me wrong, it’s alright to take information from magazines or newspapers, but take it lightly. For instance, I would have been alright if the author used only newspaper and magazine articles for her stories about the modern day princesses that were all over the press in their times. The press was how information got out during the 1900s and 2000s. I just wish she would have used only academic sources and not magazine and newspaper articles for princesses from 500 to 1000 years ago. It would have made the stories much more believable, at least for me. I found myself just kind of reading, but not having any wow moments because it was information you could find if you did a simple Google search.

            I also wasn’t a fan of the author’s attempts at witty interjections. It ruined the flow of the information. I think the author is a very talented writer and could have just written out the history without trying to modernize it by her wit because it kept my interest even when it was just an outpouring of information. It was an entertaining and easy read; not to mention that the flow from subject to subject was generally smooth (when the author didn’t provide interpolations, of course).

            I’d recommend this book simply because it is full of good stories and it really piqued my interest into discovering more about many of the princesses I read about. Besides, who didn’t want to be a princess at some point in their life? This book simply satisfied my childhood interest (but also made me think that maybe being a princess isn’t all the great!).

*Check out my other reviews -->here<--
*Subscribe to receive notifications for when I post more reviews!

Long live the queen,
Lauren

Thursday, May 24, 2018

Everless by Sara Holland

4.75 Stars


I AM SHOOK. PLOT TWISTS GALORE


Book Rating:  High PG
Language:  G
Sex:  PG  (Jules does make-out with a person whose name shall remain anonymous).
Violence:  High PG  (There’s a lot of blood, someone is stabbed in the chest, another’s neck is cut open. I’d consider it more like Narnia-esque violence).
Drug/Alcohol Use/Abuse:  G
            
            This book is so good. And not just good in the sense that the plot and characters are interesting, but good in the way that makes you feel like you’re somewhere else—like you’re only a visitor in your own world because the one from the book has totally and completely immersed you.
            
            The story takes place in a land called Sempera where seventeen-year-old Jules lives with her weakening father. It’s a world where time is considered a precious commodity to the elite few who are willing to pay for more. For most in Sempera, however, time is merely an idea, a few drops of blood that can be sold to see them through the next week. When Jules gets the opportunity to work at Everless, the palace she and her father were forced to flee ten years earlier, she jumps at it, despite her fears and hatred for the elite Gerling family.
            
            There are so many great things about this story, but what really hooked me was Jules’ character. It’s difficult now in YA to find that perfect balance between a total “Mary-Sue” character and a character whose only qualities are her toughness and emotional detachment. Sara Holland seems to achieve this balance. Jules is a tough character. She had to work hard for everything she got and it showed in her actions. This wasn’t all of her character though. Jules was also friendly and personable. She cared deeply about other people and how those people viewed her. She was hard-headed, a bit naïve at times, but never claimed she was all-knowing. There was one scene at the end of the book where Jules was witness to a death, a sudden death, and she reacted to it like a normal human being—by screaming. (Honestly, most people would probably either be too shocked to say anything or let out a cry/scream like our girl Jules did). She was an all around believable character who maintained a sense of purpose up through the very last page.

While on the subject of character, I thought Liam and Roan Gerling were both done well. I think what I like most about the brothers were their realistic relationships with Jules. Growing up, the three of them had been childhood playmates. Roan had always been the energetic and personable one whereas Liam was cold and withdrawn. I ADORED how Holland portrayed Jules’ infatuation with Roan. It was childlike and dreamy. Many authors would fall into the trap of making this childhood love the main romance from the very beginning, but I had a list of three people Jules could have ended up with and each pairing was given relatively the same amount of build-up. (This book is romance-lite™ which I appreciate more than you know). Additionally, I enjoyed the development of Liam’s character and development of Liam through Jules’ eyes. He went from “If you ever seen Liam Gerling, run” to a guy with redemptive qualities.

This isn’t a very happy story, but if you know me you’ll know I’m a sucker for that sort of thing. It made me think about what I would do in a situation where I could “bleed” my own time in order to afford my next meal. Would I do it? Would I die slower from starvation or would I give up the last year of my life for one last meager meal? How could you decide? I adore novels that represent a stark contrast between the classes because at times it seems all too real. It’s just you average girl-finds-her-courage-in-an-oppressive-world kind of story. (But one that’s done really well).

Adding to the reality of it all, I really enjoyed the relationships that were built throughout the story, I’ve read a lot of poorly written books lately and the relationships are always focused on the main character and her love interest(s). I always think of Bella Swan in this scenario. Her relationships were strictly isolated to Edward and Jacob. Her friends from school were practically non-existent because Stephenie Meyer didn’t build the friendships that would have made Bella an infinitely more compelling character. What I loved about Everless was that Sara Holland didn’t just build the relationships with Jules’ potential love interests, but she also gave her friends in Ina Gold, Alma, and Laura, and gave her mentors such as Caro (Forgive me if I butcher the spelling of names. I listened to the book and didn’t read it). Jules was able to connect with all sorts. Not only this, but the relationships were built realistically and they took their time to build from wobbly first impressions into trusting friendships and mutual understanding. PLUS, JULES WASN’T CONTINUOUSLY LUSTING AFTER ANY OF THE BOYS. (Except for Roan, but he was her childhood love, so can you really blame her)?

The only thing wrong with the story, if I were to be nitpicky, was the fact that the first several chapters fell into the unfortunate circumstance of info-dump. It took me a good while to truly understand the world and the whole concept of “bleeding time.” I suppose it was a difficult concept to explain in the first place, such as how it came to be, so I’m not entirely sure if an info-dump was avoidable in the first place.

I listened to this on Audible because sometimes they decide they love me and give me a free book and month. I didn’t enjoy the narration but felt like the story was all that really mattered. I’ll definitely be trying to get my hands on a hard copy within the next few months. I enjoyed the story enormously.

"The memory of our expulsion from Everless comes back to me in scattered images, bursts of sound and heat. I remember Liam shoving Roan toward the hearth, a moment of stillness like the space between lightning and thunder.”

*Check out my other reviews -->here<--
*Subscribe to get notification when I post more reviews!

Hail and farewell,
Lauren

Friday, May 11, 2018

The A.B.C. Murders


4 Stars


Book Rating:  PG

Language:  G

Violence:  PG (The most grisly of murders was the second one where we get a description of the dead body. Two of the murders are committed by blunt force trauma).

Sex:  G

Drugs/Alcohol:  G

            Boy, was this book a trip. I actually picked this book up because 1. There was a first edition copy sitting in my parents’ basement, and 2. I was required to read a book by a British author for my Brit Lit class—so really it was destined to be.

            I really enjoyed this story because of the enigmatic yet engaging characters. This story was driven by character and dialogue which I believe is what makes it so unique for a story written in the first half of the 20th century. I’ve read a lot of stories written in the early to mid 1900s and what comes to mind are authors like William Faulkner, John Steinbeck, and Jack London all of who heavily rely on symbols and motifs to tell their stories. The thing about Agatha Christie is that her stories are told through hearing rather than seeing. The dialogue is what drives the story forward which is incredible considering the amount of characters that are used as valuable players in the plot.
            
            The premise for the story was exquisite. I love a good psychological tale that makes you question who the murderer is, what the murderer’s motive is, and how the murderer was able to let him or herself get to the point where they were able to kill without any sense of remorse. Agatha Christie was so ahead of her time as far as delving into the mind of a madman. The only real reference she had for serial killings was Jack the Ripper in the 1800s. The notes from the killer to Poirot were reminiscent of the killers of the 70s like The Zodiac Killer or BTK. She was writing about a killer’s signature before it was even a common term. The novel explored the mind of a serial killer before the name was introduced.

I went to see Murder on the Orient Express last year and loved it. Other people didn’t like it because it seemed to drag on. The fun part about Agatha Christie’s stories though are that despite surrounding murder and mayhem they are not grisly but instead are conscientious of minor details and building relationships before cracking the cases wide open in the final few chapters. The A.B.C. Murders was exactly that. What was interesting was that the murderer was brought into close contact with Poirot and Poirot even learned to trust him. I never suspected the true killer until it was revealed in the end. Christie does such a marvelous job with her reveals. They’re lengthy, but everything is explained before being tied up with a nice little bow. Sometimes mystery authors have trouble tying down their big reveals without it being a total information dump. Agatha Christie’s novels should be used as a point of reference for writing really satisfying reveals. I didn’t feel like it was too much, it managed to stay casual, and it completely took me by surprise. (I somehow fall for the Agatha Christies plotlines all the time).
      
      Plus Poirot in and of himself is entertaining. He and Captain Hastings are just like a modern Sherlock and Doctor Watson.

“To say a man is mad is merely unintelligent and stupid. A madman is as logical and reasoned in his actions as a sane man—given his peculiar biased point of view.”

*Subscribe to get notifications when I post more reviews!
*Find my other reviews -->here<--

adjö,

lauren

Monday, May 7, 2018

Into That Forest by Louis Nowra


2 Stars


Book Rating:  PG-13

Language:  PG-13 (Multiple uses of sh*t and b*tch, the only two that really stood out)

Sex:  PG (The girls witness a man doing “something rude” to himself. They witness the tigers mating. A man exposes himself to a young girl several times over)

Violence:  PG-13 (Grisly descriptions of killing animals and blood lust as the tigers and girls tore into carcasses. Whaling descriptions)

Drugs/Alcohol:  G
            
            I wanted to like this book. I really did. I spent money on it even when I told myself I couldn’t buy anymore books. It was an interesting premise and the cover is gorgeous, how could I resist? I’m weak, okay? It just didn’t do anything for me. It was difficult to get into, it was difficult to keep going, in fact, it was difficult to finish. I debated putting it down and never picking it up again at 50% through. 
         
            I have a lot of beef with this book, but I didn’t hate it. The problem is, I can’t decide what exactly made it redeemable. It might have been the fact that it wasn’t afraid to talk about touchier subjects? I don’t really know; I’m just spitballing. Maybe I just feel like being generous.
          
            My first issue with the book was the dialect. The dialect was ridiculous. I hated it from the moment I started the book. The whole premise of the book was that when this woman, Hannah, was younger she lived with tigers in the wild and lost her language. Sure, that’s happened in other stories. Children are lost in jungles and found again, they have to relearn the norms and language of society. I just felt like Hannah definitely had enough years to learn how to speak properly. She was found again when she was about ten. She wrote down her story when she was in her seventies. Sixty years is plenty of time to relearn a language. She was around people speaking properly for years. She was around whalers in a city; she lived with a man, Ernie, until he died. These were all people who could speak. My problem with this was that she was talking about not having good grammar and language but the only bad things about her language were when she used me instead of my and were in place of was. AND THIS WAS THROUGHOUT THE ENTIRE BOOK. It was constant and annoying.
            
            I get that this story was supposed to be an honest and realistic, but there’s a line. This book made me sick. The descriptions of the girls as they tore into their fresh kills were sickening. I usually have a pretty strong stomach, but I was disgusted. The girls would shove their faces into the bloody necks on the animals and tear out their throats and then the tigers would have their turn. I hate books and movies where all the animals die so this was a really difficult book for me to finish, especially because of how grisly the deaths were in nature.
            
            On top of the animalistic nature of the story, I wasn’t able to connect with any of the characters. They annoyed me more than anything. Hannah’s narration was draining and it just felt fake. I didn’t like her in the beginning when she was normal and I didn’t like her when she was feral. I felt like she was forcing Becky into doing the things she didn’t want to do time and time again. I didn’t like Ernie or Mr. Carsons. Becky was alright. I just wasn’t attached to any of them and really had no sympathy for any of them either.
           
            Lastly, the lack of chapters drove me nuts. I felt like I was forcing myself to get through something I didn’t want to get through. There were no definitive breaks in the story. I get that this is supposed to be a stream of consciousness type of thing and I’m cool with that as long as it’s a short story. But with this, a book that is less than two-hundred pages felt like it was twice that. It was just not a fun read altogether.
            
            ALSO. It took Hannah so little time to become feral. It was like two weeks and she was running around on all fours and tearing into the throats of animals. After the flood that strands the girls, Hannah automatically adopts the two tigers as her ‘parents’ and doesn’t even give a second thought to the issue that she and Becky are stranded in the jungle. The timeline for Hannah and Becky turning feral just doesn’t make sense.
           
            I feel like this is such a mess of a review, but this was a mess of the book.

“The lean-to were filled with tiger skins all nailed to the walls of hanging from the beams—all in different stages of curing, so it stank like a swap filled with rotting animals. I think I lost most of me language there. I mean, where are the word to explain what I saw?”

*Sign up to receive notifications when I post more reviews!
*Find my other reviews -->here<--


adjö,
Lauren

Saturday, May 5, 2018

I Was a Snob...I'm a Little More Chill Now


              
              Recently, I had a conversation in my British Literature class that really ticked me off. We were talking about book to movie adaptations. If I were talking to these people five, maybe six years ago I would have vehemently agreed with them that movies desperately need to stick to the books and there is no room for interpretation. It should be the book in movie form and nothing else.
           
              Here’s where I disagree as my twenty-three-year-old self. I enjoy movies. A LOT. Films are made for entertainment. When I go to a movie, based off a book or not, I ask myself, “did I enjoy this movie?” If the answer is yes, then I say the producers succeeded in a job well done. For instance, superhero movies are a BIG thing right now. I’m not a huge fan because it seems like many of them are just constant streams of battle. (This isn’t true for all superhero movies, because Wonder Woman was lit and I will stick with that opinion until I die. I might even post a love letter to it). The point is, not all popular movies are enjoyable to me.
            
              Now, you might be asking yourself, why was Lauren so ticked off in British literature? What made her feel so passionately that she had to sit down at her computer and write up a blog post that no one may ever read?
           
              THE FREAKING HOBBIT MOVIES.
            
              As I stated earlier, I wasn’t upset because the people were talking about how good the movies were like most would assume. No, I was irritated because everyone hated them with a passion I didn’t know existed. I’m just gonna come out and say it. English literature majors are snobs. I’m two years away from getting my literature degree, I WOULD KNOW. People are entitled to their opinions and I support that wholeheartedly. You can hate The Hobbit movies, that’s fine. I happen to love them. Just give me valid arguments as to why you hate them. All my fellow classmates could come up with was that they didn’t follow the book as closely as they should have. That’s not a good enough reason.
            
              I could seriously write an entire post that would probably end up being five or six pages in standard MLA 8 format on why The Hobbit movies are great (I still might), but this isn’t what this post is about. Take a movie for what it is—a form of entertainment. How was the characterization? How did you feel about the acting? Was the movie split up well enough into action, comedy, and emotional response? How did you feel after it was over?

              I’m not saying that all movies based off of books should be more than just how accurately they portray that book, but other aspects need to be taken into account. For example, I find The Hobbit movies forgivable because the book literally had no characterization whatsoever and there was no real suspense. The movies added that. Then you look at Eragon which could have easily stayed in line with all the plot twists of the books, but instead the movie took an entirely new
direction that made it impossible for the events of the second book to occur. I still enjoyed the movie, I still watch it every once in awhile because it’s entertaining. Alternately, I love The Maze Runner movies. To be honest, the books bored me a bit. The movies get so much flak for not following the books, but I think they do just fine. It’s all about context, I suppose. (Plz don't come for me).
            
              I still think that movies should follow the books, but if the book itself is seriously lacking in characterization, action, and even the basic adventure structure, then I feel like it’s alright if aspects are added here and there. I enjoy movies. I enjoy books. I enjoy movies based off of books. I just feel like I’ve become more relaxed when it comes to movie adaptations because if they are enjoyable, who am I to judge? I can still read the book if I’m not satisfied in the end.

*Subscribe to get notifications when I post something new!

adjö,
Lauren